Shinzo Abe may have violated Japan's strict political funding laws
Credit: REUTERS
Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Friday corrected statements he had made in parliament and apologised for what he said were mistakes regarding a political funding scandal.
Mr Abe said he felt deeply responsible for making repeated false denials that his political funding group had subsidised cherry blossom viewing parties for his supporters, in possible violation of the country’s strict political funding laws.
Japan’s longest-serving leader said he had known nothing about the payments and pledged to work to regain public trust. The apology came after his secretary was on Thursday summarily indicted over the issue and fined 1 million yen (£7,110).
"Even though the accounting procedures happened without my knowledge, I feel morally responsible for what happened," Mr Abe told a parliamentary committee. "I reflect on this deeply and apologise from my heart to the citizens and to all lawmakers."
Mr Abe also filed corrected political funding reports for the last three years.
The public apology marks a sharp reversal of fortune for Mr Abe. He quit as prime minister on health grounds in September after serving nearly eight years as prime minister.
The scandal threatens to damage his successor, Yoshihide Suga, who was Mr Abe’s right-hand man throughout his term and has defended his former boss in parliament.
Mr Suga, who has been beset by other controversies and seen his ratings slide less than a year before the next lower-house election must be called, has apologised for making inaccurate statements.
Read more: How Yoshihide Suga defied the odds to succeed Shinzo Abe
Mr Abe did not respond to questions from opposition MPs about whether he would take political responsibility for the scandal by resigning as an MP.
He struggled to explain why he was able to file detailed updated funding reports even though he says his office does not have the underlying receipts for the parties.
Mr Abe’s statements to parliament from the end of 2019 contradicted the findings of the prosecutors at least 118 times, several domestic media reported, citing a parliamentary research bureau.
Свежие комментарии