Anyone betting that Labour's railway nationalization plans will usher in a golden age of cut-price train travel will be betting extremely disappointed.
Given the hype surrounding the launch of the policy, passengers spending £4,000 a year to stand from Woking to Waterloo every day could be forgiven for imagining that Labor would at least , promised cheaper tickets. Rail fares have risen sharply since the pandemic, even as delays have gotten worse.
However, the strategy, dubbed «Moving Britain» and outlined in a 28-page brochure adorned with a union flag and a train speeding through a bucolic landscape, offers no such assurance.
Instead, the document promises that the administration Starmer will introduce a «best price guarantee» aimed at ensuring passengers are offered the cheapest fare on their chosen route.
Although this is welcome news for people who mistakenly overpay for tickets. Tickets baffled by the variety of options usually available are unlikely to be cause for much celebration in the lobby.
Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh spoke candidly about Labour's pricing plans for Great British Railways (GBR) at a press conference on Thursday.
«I can't say today that we will cut fares,» she said. “But we said we would make it simpler, more accessible, more transparent and more trustworthy for passengers.”
The report says prices must be kept at levels that benefit both rail users and taxpayers, highlighting a central tension when it comes to rail. Even if nationalized, ministers will be reluctant to generously fund a sector that, while important to the economy, does not universally benefit all Britons, at least not on a day-to-day basis.
In many ways, the privatized railroad became a victim of its own success. After several difficult years, passenger numbers rose sharply to levels last seen after the First World War.
However, the railway, with its often outdated infrastructure, struggled to keep up with demand, leading to overcrowding and delays that deteriorated network performance. Tariffs remained high as the government prioritized cutting subsidies and sought to move to a user-pays approach.
Reducing ticket prices, by contrast, would require increasing subsidies, which the Labor Party is reluctant to fund given the many other demands on the public purse and its determination. adhere to budget rules.
Sir Keir Starmer's Labor government will also have to contend with pressure from MPs and unions to end nearly two years of rail strikes by agreeing to wage demands that would eat into the railway's budget.
General RMT secretary Mick Lynch praised Labour's move to nationalize rail franchises as they expire, calling it «in the interests of railway workers».
He said the move should be “the first step towards fully integrating our entire railway into public ownership.”
Labor is also tackling a huge technical challenge by making simplification of the railway's labyrinthine ticketing system a key part of its strategy.
The numbers are daunting: Labor estimates there are 55 million different fares, discounts and ticket types. .
Their desire to reduce this number is based on existing Conservative plans, but this will not make it easier to implement.
“There are so many types of tickets, restrictions and points. shopping,” says Mark Plowright, director of online shopping at Virgin Trains Ticketing.
“Passengers, of course, want a simpler model, but there is no consensus on what it should look like. So it will be baby steps.»
Labour also promised to introduce innovations including automatic reimbursement, digital pay-as-you-go and digital passes across the network.
Plowright says the current structure tariffs are so complex that Labor will need a completely new system to deliver on its promises. This may take several years.
Other elements of Labour's plan are outlined only in broad strokes.
Labour will develop a long-term industrial strategy for ordering rolling stock — the very trains that run on the tracks — to end the boom-bust cycle that has driven train makers Alstom and Bombardier is considering closing its UK plants.
While the promise of «strong work flow» will be welcomed by manufacturers, the changes could mean less competition for orders as work will be shared between them, saving jobs but likely increasing costs. It could also make it difficult to reduce ticket prices.
Labour has said it has no intention of nationalizing the railway's rolling stock given the multi-billion pound costs, and GBR continues to lease trains after acquiring the franchises.
It has committed to reviewing funding structures for future orders in partnership with private capital and plans to remove barriers to train sharing across the network.
The rail freight sector will also remain in private hands and need to be given the same priority as and passenger transport, Labor says. Trains will be given unobstructed tracks rather than constantly stopping to allow express trains to pass. Investments in freight trains and terminals will be encouraged.
Moving freight onto rails is considered critical to achieving decarbonization goals, with one train capable of carrying the freight equivalent of 129 trucks.
< p>Rail Partners, which represents companies such as Avanti West Coast parent FirstGroup, which are threatened effectively being kicked out of UK railways if the policy is implemented argues that Labor is making a mistake.
Chief executive Andy Bagnall said: “Creating a thriving railway for customers and taxpayers should not be an ideological choice between a monopoly railway in public hands and a railway that enables private investment and innovation through franchising.”
He believes that such an option already exists. an alternative model is available that serves both purposes. The GBR could create a Transport for London model that reports to mayor Sadiq Khan but also relies on private sector companies to operate trains.
Europe is now shrugging off its history of monolithic state-owned railways and seeking to emulate Britain's a model using competitive tendering and public-private partnerships.
While others look at our systems, Labor appears to be looking back. And while simplification of the system is a valid goal, many passengers could be forgiven for thinking that Sir Keir and his team missed the boat with no guarantee that ticket prices would fall.
Свежие комментарии