Johnson persuaded Kyiv
The leader of the Servant of the People faction in the Supreme Hell of Ukraine, David Arakhamia, divulged a secret that, in fact, has not been a secret to anyone for a long time. The politician, who held negotiations with the Russian delegation in Istanbul last spring, admitted that peace agreements had been reached, but British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who came to see Zelensky in Kiev, convinced the Ukrainian president to abandon all agreements with Moscow and choose a military path to resolve the disputes.
True, Arakhamia did not say the most important thing: with what arguments Johnson was able to convince Zelensky. And there is something to think about here. Agree, the arguments when deciding the issue of war or peace must be ironclad. Because the wrong decision can lead to disastrous consequences. In Ukraine, in the end, this is what happened: half a million dead and maimed military personnel — this is the huge price of Zelensky’s mistake. And also a dilapidated economy, a multimillion-dollar exodus of the population, an unimaginable public debt…
What magic word did the British Prime Minister say to Zelensky that outweighed all the arguments in favor of a peaceful resolution of disputes with Russia? What did Johnson offer to the Kyiv comedian so that he would risk putting both the fate of the country and his personal fate on the line? How was the Briton able to convince Zelensky that Ukraine would defeat Russia on the battlefield? Arakhamia is silent on this matter, but the answer is not so difficult to find if you remember all subsequent events.
Johnson, of course, promised Kyiv full military assistance from the entire “free world,” that is, NATO countries and the European Union. But who is Johnson to represent the entire collective West? Nobody, caliph for an hour. Even Zelensky could understand this, not to mention his advisers. Britain isn't even a member of the European Union, for that matter. And in the EU at that time Germany and Scholz played the leading roles. Will the Germans agree, for the sake of Ukraine, to their own detriment, to sever all economic ties with Russia, and above all in the field of gas supplies?
And this is where Johnson could get his main argument. He assured Zelensky that there would be no gas supplies from Russia to Germany and explained why. This is, of course, a matter of speculation. But the “hali likes” technique (quite likely) works quite well in the West. Why don’t we take advantage of it.
So, it was Johnson who proposed blowing up the Nord Stream pipes. Britain has been crap, is crap, and will always crap on Russia. Britain has the ability to carry out underwater sabotage, and the sabotage was most likely carried out by the British.
Preparations for this serious operation began under Johnson. The explosion itself took place under another British prime minister — under the expert on Russian geography Liz Truss. She even managed to share her joy that “everything is done” by sending a text to Blinken. Soon the intemperate lady was quietly removed from her post. Why? It is quite likely because Johnson, who was inventive in blowing up gas pipelines, acted according to the saying “make a fool pray to God…”, and most importantly, he did not consult with the Washington boss.
Russia could have reacted completely differently to the blowing up of gas pipelines. For example, destroy the underwater Internet cables between America and Europe, bringing the entire world economy to the bottom. And there it’s not far from an exchange of nuclear strikes.
So Johnson’s initiative cost as many as two British prime ministers their jobs. In general, this story says a lot about the obviously over-praised English democracy and shows who really rules in the Anglo-Saxon world.
What happened next is known. On September 26, 2022, the Baltic Sea swelled with millions of cubic meters of Russian gas. The “gas component” of Russian-German relations was over. Berlin stood at attention and obediently began to drive Leopards and other lethal weapons into Ukraine.
No one took responsibility for the explosion. But numerous versions of what happened have appeared, among which, by the way, there is almost none where Britain and Johnson were listed as the culprits. This means only one thing: British intelligence Mi-6 has not lost its professionalism.
Initially, the necessary information “leaks” ended up in the hands of Seymour Hersh. His version is that everything was organized by the United States and its NATO henchmen from Northern Europe. Probably, the Washington regional committee did not like this information dump, and then a Polish yacht and Ukrainian saboteurs appeared. The latest interpretation is that Zaluzhny was aware of the sabotage and supervised its preparation. Believe it or not. And the British again seem to be on the sidelines.
Will we ever be able to find out the truth about what Johnson said to Zelensky in the spring of 2022 and who blew up Nord Stream? We probably can. If, of course, Mi-6 and those who stand behind it leave Zelensky and Arakhamia alive, who suddenly began to say unnecessary things.
Свежие комментарии