Connect with us

Привет, что-то ищете?

The Times On Ru
  1. The Times On RU
  2. /
  3. Технологии
  4. /
  5. Artificial intelligence has solved the mystery of Raphael's masterpiece: who ..

Технологии

Artificial intelligence has solved the mystery of Raphael's masterpiece: who painted the Holy Family

«Madonna della Rosa» has several authors

The mystery of Raphael's masterpiece may have been solved with the help of artificial intelligence. The algorithm concludes that most of the Madonna della Rosa painting was painted by the great Renaissance master, but not the face of St. Joseph.

The mystery surrounding Raphael's long-debated masterpiece, which is housed in Madrid's Prado Museum, may have been solved by an artificial intelligence algorithm developed in Bradford, Britain.

As The Guardian writes, “Madonna della Rosa” (Madonna of the Rose) has intrigued art lovers and experts for centuries.

The painting shows Mary, Joseph and the baby Jesus with the baby John the Baptist. It was believed to be entirely the work of Raphael until doubts arose in the 19th century. Art historians argued that the painting should also be attributed to his workshop. Some said that the figure of Joseph looked like a later insertion and could not possibly have been painted by Raphael's hand. Others thought the bottom part with the rose was painted by someone else. In Spain, the painting has always been attributed to Raphael, notes The Guardian.

The painting has now been tested using artificial intelligence developed by Hassan Ugail, professor of visual computing at the University of Bradford.

His conclusion is that most of the painting is by Raphael, but the face of St. Joseph is painted by a different hand. The lower part is “likely” to be by Raphael.

Professor Ugail said the algorithm was developed after he studied 49 undisputed works by Raphael in extraordinary detail and as a result can recognize the artist's genuine works with 98% accuracy .

“The computer looks at the picture in great detail,” explains Ugail. “Not just the face, he looks at all parts of it and studies the color palette, shades, tonal values ​​and brush strokes. He understands the painting almost microscopically, he studies all the key characteristics of Raphael's brush.”

In the case of the Madonna, initial testing showed that it was 60% Raphael's. The computer then scanned the painting piece by piece and concluded that Joseph's face was not by Raphael.

The discovery is part of a new paper published Thursday in the Heritage Science journal.

Howell Edwards, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Spectroscopy at Bradford and co-author of the paper, said: “Analysis of our work using artificial intelligence software has convincingly demonstrated that while the three figures of Madonna, Jesus and St John the Baptist are clearly Raphael, the figure of St Joseph is not. , and it was painted by someone else.”

The researchers also tested another painting in question, known as the Haddo Madonna, which hangs at Haddo House, Aberdeenshire.

It was purchased as an original work by Raphael in the 19th century by George Gordon, 4th Earl of Aberdeen, who was British Prime Minister from 1852-55. It was later attributed to the minor artist Innocenza da Imola.

In 2016, art critic Bendor Grosvenor stated in the BBC's Lost Masterpieces of Britain that it was the work of Raphael. National Gallery experts later said this was unlikely.

Artificial intelligence sided with Grosvenor, concluding that it was most likely the work of Raphael.

Ugail had previously used artificial intelligence computer facial recognition on a painting known as Tondo de Bresi, which bears similarities to Raphael's Sistine Madonna. The computer determined that the work was by Raphael.

Professor Ugail happily admits that he “knows nothing about art” and that his work may be viewed coldly by art critics.

“I think there is fear, and they also think that we are naive, that we don’t know what we are doing,” he said.

But Ugail believes that art critics will eventually be won over and see in AI an additional way to authenticate great art. He stressed that he does not believe that artificial intelligence will replace humans: “The process of authenticating a piece of art involves considering many aspects, its origin, pigments, condition of work and so on. This kind of software can be used as one of the tools to help in the process.”

Оставить комментарий

Leave a Reply

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Стоит Посмотреть

Новости По Дате

Декабрь 2023
Пн Вт Ср Чт Пт Сб Вс
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Вам может быть интересно:

Спорт

Zen Чемпионка Европы по фигурному катанию Алена Косторная заявила изданию Sport, что пропустит сразу два соревновательных сезона «для решения личных проблем». Что скрывается за...

Общество

ZenДОНЕЦК, 3 ноября. Число раненых в результате атаки украинского беспилотника на станцию ​​Никитовка в Горловке в ДНР возросло до двух человек, сообщил мэр города...

Бизнес

В третьем квартале 2024 года более 70% особо критических киберинцидентов были связаны с компрометацией учетных записей сотрудников. По данным центра противодействия кибератакам Solar JSOC...

Культура

ZenМОСКВА, 17 октября В столичном Театре имени Моссовета открылся Международный кинофестиваль «Евразия-Кинофест», сообщает корреспондент. «Для меня большая честь объявить первый Евразийский кинофестиваль открытым», —...