Avoiding drink breaks could be a good way to speed up first-class cricket. Photo: Reuters/Lee Smith
If you're an Essex or Surrey fan like me, the resumption of the County Championship this week was a big moment as we wait to see which of these top teams will win the title. There are also issues of promotion and relegation to be resolved. However, for most people, the existence of first-class cricket is neither here nor there. The guys we hope to get into the game are back in school. The cricket establishment continues to obsess over meaningless one-day celebrations and the upcoming World Cup, which begins in less than a month. There is excitement about T20 taking part in the 2028 Olympics, another sign of the direction cricket is steadily heading, driven largely by Indian money. Keep in mind that to find a link to any of this you'll have to dig underneath tons of football and rugby coverage.
This is what happens when first-class cricket is relegated to the margins of the season: it becomes invisible. It had just passed the first August in two hundred years in which first-class cricket had not been played in peacetime, so he had dropped off the radar. Those of us who have reached a certain age and remember spending August afternoons as boys on the festival grounds watching the cricket championship, which gave us a lifelong addiction to the game, now understand how lucky we are.
When the pointless Hundred was invented — what a piece of genius it was — we were told that it would bring people into the game who had previously ignored it, essentially as an entry point from which they could move on to full-time cricket. How is this possible when such cricket is now played almost entirely outside of school holidays? Also, what does the International Olympic Committee's adoption of the T20 say about the future of the Hundred? They voted with their feet, and if ever there was a sign that the England and Wales Cricket Board should bring a humane killer to justice, this is certainly it.
If we want to continue to play Test cricket — and I don't take anything for granted — then we need first-class cricket to provide players. It's clear that some of the skills honed in limited-overs cricket were put to good use in the Buzzball-style series against Australia that ended six weeks ago, and it's nice to say that long-form cricket doesn't have to be tedious. anyone. However, despite England's moral victory in the series (due to the weather at Old Trafford), they still lost two Tests, and lost them for reasons that seemed to me mainly to be a lack of experience at the center of serious cricket . Old problems have resurfaced: if a player loses form during a series being played back-to-back so that more meaningless one-day cricket can be included in the schedule, how can he regain his form? And if non-English players age out of first-class cricket, how do they demonstrate their apparent suitability to move into the team?
Such competitions like the Hundred further push first-class cricket into the background. Photo: Getty Images/Julian Finney
Next year the tour will take them to the West Indies (a shadow of their former selves) and Sri Lanka. It will be interesting to see what interest the tests generate. It's not just that first-class cricket is so inaccessible to a large potential audience due to scheduling, with live Test cricket only available on subscription television, people have found other things to do in their free time. Test cricket itself, even under Basball, is not all it is cracked up to be. The over-staking of the Ashes series was scandalous, with five hours of cricket sometimes stretched to six-and-a-half hours a day. People paying £120 for a ticket are being scammed on these occasions: imagine buying a pint of beer, finding the beer an inch below the rim of the glass when it's served to you, but being told the beer is so good you've won. didn't notice. I think not.
It's a miracle that as many people watch Test cricket as they do, given the lack of first-class county cricket to lift their spirits and the huge spending on a day out: if the ECB had intended to make it exclusive, In rich people's sport they have done brilliantly. But if they're going to destroy value by suffering sharp declines in rates, even the rich would do well to reconsider spending so much money. Various solutions have been proposed to speed up the process. Firstly, there is no excuse for the long-running drama of the DRS reviews: since artificial intelligence [AI] is capable of writing the eighth volume of Proust, it can surely be used to give an instant verdict on whether someone is out or not. Indeed, advances in technology have the potential to change a lot about the role of judges and require urgent intelligent debate. But the appeal decision must be made immediately or completely overturned, and the batsman given out (or otherwise) by the umpire, who received instant instructions via an earpiece from the robot.
And on days that represent a typical English summer, there's no need for a drinking break — something that hasn't happened before, except when it's been sweltering. And the umpires need to be given the authority to continue the game: there is too much posturing, posturing and preening, not just between overs but also between balls. Why, within living memory, has it been so easy to bowl 17 or 18 overs in an hour in a Test match, whereas now it is 12 or 13? On a six-hour day, even 17 hours is 102 overs a day. Some argue that the entertainment is so good that the inflated prices don't matter. However, as the cricket public becomes increasingly aware that they are being robbed on an imperial scale, they will begin to matter very much.
Wait until the 2024 county matches to see what, if anything, has been done- This was done to raise the profile of first-class cricket and make it more accessible to the new cricketing public. It needs to be played throughout the season: if we are going to have two divisions then they should be the same size and everyone should play each other twice, which will give a little more cricket: and speed up the game in the county, perhaps by bringing back Three-Day matches with a large number of overs served per day will certainly help attract a crowd, especially if they are held from Friday to Sunday. It would be nice to imagine the ECB doing some strategic thinking on this issue, but not only do I doubt they've even started, I highly doubt they see the point in doing anything as the T20 cash cow is constantly being milked. . The districts themselves need to give them a kick, and a hard one, because very soon this will become an existential problem for them.
Свежие комментарии